🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios introduced a fresh game mode called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this mode mirrors the regular Breakthrough setup but features a few key changes:

• Every squad includes only 8 human participants, with the remaining filled by 32 bots.
• Actions done by real players grant complete experience points, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Only two locations can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Features like Player tags, achievements, and career stat updates have been turned off.

In short, the playlist lives up to its title: it's a laid-back take of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume there's nothing wrong, since it provides additional choices for players looking for different methods to have fun with the title. But, gaming history have taught us anything, it's that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Community Reactions: Anger to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the errors of your competitors," reads one reply to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments another. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this game," and someone else lists all the issues they consider to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to practice, real players prevent it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," says a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are gamers who have lives and can't play this title 24/7. Let them strike a balance," adds another. One reply on Twitter explains that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is perfect for me," and another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Criticisms and Player Input

All that said, there are constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it could increase wait times more extended for different playlists due to the sheer number of options currently available. Similarly, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of real players, even though it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide full XP, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to eliminate bot farms from the mode. So Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base meeting them in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. Another describes this addition as the devs "making a mistake significantly, I had so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Occur?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something to date with Battlefield 6, it is that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data shows this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.